WWRC 86-05ee
State Financing Alternatives for Wyoming Water Development: Outline of Presentation
Outline
-
I. Background of water development in Wyoming
II. Funding in recent past
- A. Total budgeting
-
- 1. Prior to 1983, $199 million with $42.7
million expended
- 2. In 1986, added $86 million for total of
$280 million
- B. Projects approved
-
- 1. Buffalo Bill; $47 million
- 2. Deer Creek; $45 million
- 3. Sulphur Creek; $25 million
- 4. Cheyenne Water Project; $107 million,
including $40 million loan
- C. Middle Folk Project put on hold
-
III. We are now at a stage where we need to reexamine funding sources
- A. Decline in value of oil, natural gas, and other
minerals with reduced revenues. ($1.00
decline in oil price = $190,00 loss to the
Water Development Account II.)
- B. Long start-up time requires advance planning
- C. Discussion of present system
-
IV. Repayment of loans to local governments
- A. Water revenue bonds
- B. General obligation bonds
- C. Optional sales tax (two-year option-the
fourth one cent)
- D. Capital facilities optional sales tax (the fifth
one cent)
- E. Combinations of these options mixed with
appropriations from the general fund
-
V. Other approaches to funding
- A. Arizona
- B. Montana
- C. Industrial companies-Little Horn Group
- D. Intermediation option
-
- 1. Bring capital from other sources to entities
that cannot borrow on their own
- 2. WCDA as possible intermediary
- E. Secondary repayment sources
-
- 1. State loan with take-out later
- 2. Substituting tax revenues which are not
pledgeable under the Witzenburger decision
with federal mineral royalties; permissible
under the Herschler decision
VI. Summary & conclusions
Water Resources Publications List
Water Resources Data System Library |
Water Resources Data System Homepage